Research report2024San Diego

Not So Gentle Density: An Early Assessment of the San Diego Bonus ADU Program

California ADU researchers

Main finding

The bonus program enabled small multifamily-style infill, but utility costs, financing, geography, and implementation capacity constrained early delivery.

40% of proposed bonus ADUs were in Moderate Resource areas, versus 25% of all ADUs

Most important limitation

Most observations were proposed or permitted rather than completed; overlapping state and local reforms prevent a citywide causal conclusion.

From the publication

Inspect the authors' figure directly

Study chart · redrawn

Figure 6 · Proposed bonus-ADU projects by units per project

Most proposals remained modest, while a smaller group used the program for substantially larger infill projects.

REDRAWN FROM STUDY DATAFigure 6 · Proposed bonus-ADU projects by units per project
Figure 6 · Proposed bonus-ADU projects by units per projectMost proposals remained modest, while a smaller group used the program for substantially larger infill projects. Values digitized from Figure 6 in the archived publication; minor reading error is possible.010203040ProjectsTotal proposed units per projectBonus-program projects2345678910+
Figure 6 · Proposed bonus-ADU projects by units per project. Values digitized from Figure 6 in the archived publication; minor reading error is possible.
Total proposed units per projectBonus-program projects
242
337
423
515
610
76
84
92
10+3

Source: California ADU researchers (2024), Figure 6; PDF p. 31.

Read carefully: The records are proposed projects, not completed homes; the source excludes one 148-unit outlier from this chart.

How this study is used

Claims this evidence supports

Strong evidenceLegal on paper is not the same as buildable in practice.See the full evidence stack →

Reference

California ADU researchers (2024). “Not So Gentle Density: An Early Assessment of the San Diego Bonus ADU Program.”

Open publisher or paper (opens in a new tab)